I have a problem that is similar to some previous threads, but I have been unable to locate a solution. I need to install a flex circuit into a semi-spherical shape and will need to play with the geometry to get the best shape for sufficient coverage and 'fit' to the surface. Realizing that I will never get a true fit to the domed surface with the flex circuit, my plan was to iterate the design by creating flat patterns of the trimmed surface but I am not able to produce the pattern I desire. My intent is to have the flat pattern 'unwrap' from the domed surface rather than project to a flat surface (as intended with formed parts). The flatten quilt feature in the model shows how it is shrinking the geometry in the flat pattern, where I would prefer it to maintain a comparable size. I have also attempted to use the Flatten-Quilt Deformation tool, but was unable to configure it properly to generate a solution.
I realize that what I'm asking for is unconventional because any flat pattern will not be able to conform to a compound curvature without some level of deformation. Once again my plan is to iterate the flat pattern design to make a physical evaluation of the imperfect fit. The flex circuit does not need to be perfectly flush with the surface so it would just be a matter of creating a geometry that did not allow too many creases or flats. I was hoping to use the all powerful Flatten-Quilt function to ease my burden of measuring/calculating the geometry, but any approaches that the community can offer will be appreciated!
Tagging some users that have commented on similar thread topics that I have found helpful in this endeavor...
Brian MartinFrank SchiavoneAntonius DirriwachterEric Terrell